Recently I’ve been exploring the best ways for companies to establish their workers successfully in the use of social media, both internally and externally to their organizations. Driving adoption and effective uptake of social tools varies rather widely in how easy and quickly it is to for a given business to realize. For example, this process is the most challenging for regulated industries as I deconstructed at length on ZDNet this week. Yet it’s the same issue for all firms: How do we quickly and effectively deal with issues surrounding risk, control, and trust so that we can get to the good part and reap the rewards of social media engagement?
A few weeks ago I took a look at useful and proven techniques for the the early adoption phase of social business, which is often the trickiest and most fraught with challenges. But there’s another important aspect of social media that’s often neglected, overly legalized, and treated as a static formality through which to guide social media use in safe and constructive directions (again primarily to deal with risk and associated worries.) I’m talking about the often-discussed but all-to-frequently under appreciated social media policy.
Social media policy is usually not perceived as an exciting topic, yet at this stage of the industry nothing could be further from the truth. It should now be considered a primary enabler as enterprises develop — or update — their social business strategies. Because of this perception, one of the more powerful and transformative tools in the social business arsenal will be left to languish unmodernized by many, making the organization do too much work, assume too much downside, and ignore important upsides.
The good news is that from my experience, most social media policies have evolved into largely common sense listings of how to protect yourself, your co-workers, the company, and your customers from potential missteps in a very public forum. In that most workers can now read and generally understand their company’s social media policy (at least once, hopefully) it serves its purpose. But an infrequently revised and non-operational social media policy means that 1) most of the potential value that it could provide fails to be seized and 2) it misses a major opportunity to become a place to communicate, realize strategic vision, and enable on-the-ground change across the company in a surprisingly concrete way.
The essential point here is that the manner in which companies go about connecting their employees to the channels of social media does very much matter in the end. Creating an environment that makes it easy for workers to succeed is one of the most important first steps. In this, a more up-to-date and modern conception of social media policy and associated governance is needed. It must be adaptive, dynamic, and living. It must also have a closed feedback loop with the rapidly changing and evolving environment it purports to govern.
The industry has recently begun seeing the necessary trappings from enterprise social software vendors to enable a new vision for social media enablement, one driven by policy, yet leaves participants free to act as they need, knowing they’ll be quite safe in the boundaries that have been prescribed. When it comes to the strategies that drive social business performance, we find that social media works best when its users are set free to create the collaborative patterns, structures, and processes they need to work together, inside, outside, or between companies. When they have a safety net that ensures they can act with confidence, the results will correspondingly improve. And when corporate governance teams and senior leaders realize that a safety net is operational around the clock and around the globe and that it accurately represents their concerns, they have their own level of confidence to begin driving forward social business objectives, knowing that in these fairly uncertain times, their imagined downsides are at bay.
What does a modern social business policy look like, one that enables this scenario? It should contain the following three ongoing processes:
Define
The modern social media policy should be contained in a blog post, wiki page, or some other social artifact so it can be revised quickly and easily, as well as commented on and discussed. It should be updated no less than once a month and preferably after every significant lesson learned.
It should contain the code of conduct, key laws and regulations that must be followed for that industry and company, as well as relevant IT policy and associated issues. It should also contain good examples of best practices that helps spark workflow improvements and local innovations to business processes. This latter piece is a major opportunity missed in my opinion and requires little additional effort. The policy should also represent the latest best practices being captured within the organization, giving examples of key elements of the policy. In fact, tying useful techniques to policy ensure that the additional context makes it more relevant as well as making it much more useful and interesting to most line workers, increasingly absorption.
Communicate
The social media policy should be communicated via training, clearly articulated goals and incentives (real-life examples of which I’ll explore as soon as possible), and executive outreach including leading through example. Communication of the policy should be conducted during new employee on boarding, for contractors, and for existing employees, ideally using lightweight education technologies that makes it simple to review. In fact, since the policy will change often, the lightest weight forms of content should be used since it will be updated frequently.
Verify
When it comes to social media, the best way to reduce concerns about risk and liability while simultaneously ensuring safety and widespread participation is to trust, but verify. The latest social media compliance tools can be used to literally embody the social media policy as a real, participatory actor in the system, creating secure narrative logs for regulators and internal audit, while monitoring conversations, detecting policy violations quickly, and interceding automatically if necessary. This is where exciting new fields of social analytics and business intelligence come into play as a key element of monitoring, detection, and reporting. I’ll be exploring the latest of these capabilities soon to see what their strengths and weaknesses are, but it’s currently ushering in a major new way to connect policy, corporate governance, while lifting the shackles from social media so it can get real work done while practically dealing with the realities of a highly dynamic and freeform new medium.
Thus, taking all three of these processes into account, the best way to connect employees to social media is to create an environment where their actions are not only going to be checked with business guidelines at a distance, but literally made safe yet productive at all times. While this is a newer conception of policy, as a living, breathing agent in the ecosystem, it’s one that is now within reach for most firms to ensure the openness and transparency of social media give us the results we’re looking for, day in and day out.
Social business is rapidly evolving and the possibilities of enabling social media in a policy driven way that lowers concerns while tapping into what makes it special is key. I’d love to hear your stories about how your organization is dealing with policy.

People are social creatures, right? And as more and more people get online, we’re all openly sharing our lives with each other. Facebook, Twitter, now G+ and not to mention our opinions/comments across all the blogs/forums or even just articles such as this.
So where does that leave privacy in regards to brand reputation? It really doesn’t. What an employee says or does online might have serious impact on consumer sentiment about a brand. Rather than a stifling policy though, I believe that firms need to be educating and enabling their employees. Why? Because at the end of the day, business is still done the way it’s always been done, by building relationships, one at a time. As the internet has evolved, we all have a voice now. (.. and while some scream and shout too much, others are still learning the hard way that they need to be wary of what they post as everyone might see it!)
Social business is social so why not empower your employees to collaborate?
Dion,
Thank you so much for your insightful post. I have been giving this a lot of thought lately because I have become a raving fan of the company I work for, Vistage.com, on Twitter. I am a manger with direct reports and want to find ways to engage them in increasing our brand awareness through social media.
Your process is very valid and really works. For me, definition of the goals is the critical point to successful use of social media at work. I hope everyone who reads the post will consider implementing these in their companies.
Rock on!
Great article Dion,
I’m going through this right now with my company. In my case, I’m the low level employee that upper management fears because of my digital presence. I think they fear that what I’ll say publicly is contradictory to the corporate policy, beliefs or direction.
On one hand, this fear is understandable. As a low level employee, I am not aware of many of the corporate initiatives and big picture plans because of my “we’ll tell you when you need to know” position. For as long as I’m in this position, I could unknowingly derail some of their future plans and contradict their position. In other cases, there could be disgruntled employees (not me) who would look to use the corporate digital platforms to defame their own employer. In these instances, the company fears that they are creating a platform for disruption. In another scenario, companies could fear that they are creating their own competition by training employees how to use social plaforms, promoting these employees then losing these employees to competitors.
On the other hand, this fear is irrational. I like the place I work and the people I work with. I publish, share and curate content not to harm my employer, but rather to make myself better, share knowledge with teammates and differentiate myself from my competition. Social media and the surrounding digital ecosystems are so new that there are very few people who can act as social guides. I’m my own guinea pig and I’m constantly testing theories to find out what works. I’ve been conducting experiments on myself for the past 3 years and when I do, it’s my name on the line. I know that what I say is public and I’m accountable for it.
Setting up a social policy is a great way to create a level playing field that both management and their subordinates can refer to. Making it a living document is even smarter. As I said earlier, this is all so new that policies will likely have to change frequently as each company breaks new ground.
Marc,
Great insight re: it can be difficult to craft a social media policy that doesn’t clash with any undisclosed future plans of management. In a social business — with it’s more public internal knowledge flow — this will be less likely, though still a challenge.
You are also correct that a good policy will “level the playing field” between management and their staff. I do believe, as you say, that keeping the social media policy up-to-date is essential. Not necessarily because workers will keep reading the changes (they generally won’t) but because if the policy is embodied operationally, and someone accidentally does the wrong thing, it will be caught in the ‘safety net’ of business rules, analytics, and daily audits and addressed as early as possible.
Thanks for stopping by and sharing your personal insights on this very important topic.
Best,
Dion Hinchcliffe
Dion,
Thanks for elaborating your thoughts on a very important subject. Many organizations, who want to start their journey towards social enablement need to critically think on the SM policy that they need to create. Starting the SM journey without a sound policy is like driving on a road with no defined destination.
I think when you say that the SM policy needs to be on a blog, where people can discuss, comment is in essence saying that the policy needs to be akin to a ‘living artifact’ which can evolve to the changing dynamics and not just a static document.
I firmly believe that organizations need to be socially enabled internally and then only they can be truly socially engaged externally. Going forward, it just can’t be let to a select group of people (in marketing, sales, customer service) to be socially enabled externally without they tapping into the internal social enabled enterprise.
Towards this, I think that the dynamics, context & implementation nuances within the enterprise are different from the external landscape and hence there is a need for a differentiated internal & external SM policy. This doesn’t mean that they differ at the concept level but just the implementations, rules of engagement could differ and clearly articulating it though separate SM policies would reduce confusion & give greater clarity.
Again, thanks for a great post & sharing your thoughts.
Regards,
Shahnawaz